US v. Curtis Arnold

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999765076]. Mailed to: Curtis Arnold. [15-7543]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7543 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7543 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CURTIS ARNOLD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: March 1, 2016 Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7543 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend the statement of reasons in his criminal judgment. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Arnold, No. 3:05-cr-00046-RJC- DSC-2 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?