US v. Curtis Arnold
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999765076]. Mailed to: Curtis Arnold. [15-7543]
Appeal: 15-7543
Doc: 5
Filed: 03/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7543
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS ARNOLD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided: March 1, 2016
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7543
Doc: 5
Filed: 03/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to amend the statement of reasons in his criminal
judgment.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Arnold, No. 3:05-cr-00046-RJC-
DSC-2 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?