Joel Vicars v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00620-NKM-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999842181]. Mailed to: Joel Vicars. [15-7546]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7546 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7546 JOEL VICARS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC); A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations of the VDOC; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations of the VDOC; GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Superintendent/Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison; DAVID ZOOK, Assistant Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison; REBECCA YOUNG, Operations Manager/Officer at Wallens Ridge State Prison; W. TODD FARRIS, Unit Manager at Wallens Ridge State Prison; DENNIS COLLINS, Unit Manager at Wallens Ridge State Prison; QUINCEY REYNOLDS, Unit Manager of the 864.1 VHU at Wallens Ridge State Prison; BRENDA RAVIZEE, Institutional Ombudsman/Grievance Coordinator at Wallens Ridge State Prison, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00620-NKM-RSB) Submitted: May 13, 2016 Decided: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June 3, 2016 Appeal: 15-7546 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Joel Vicars, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-7546 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/03/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Joel Vicars appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized 2000cc-5 (2012). reversible error. We Persons have Act, reviewed 42 the U.S.C. record §§ 2000cc and find to no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vicars v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00620-NKM- RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?