Antonio Davis v. Sara Giron
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cv-03429-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999721066]. Mailed to: Antonio Davis. [15-7560]
Appeal: 15-7560
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/18/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7560
ANTONIO DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEP. SARA GIRON,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RICHLAND COUNTY; SHERIFF LEON LOTT; DEP. ADRIAN THOMPSON;
DEP. ADAM CORNWELL; RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (4:12-cv-03429-RMG)
Submitted:
December 15, 2015
Before GREGORY
Circuit Judge.
and
FLOYD,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
December 18, 2015
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Appeal: 15-7560
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/18/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Antonio Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
David Allan DeMasters, Joel
Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7560
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/18/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Appellee Sara Giron.
may
exercise
jurisdiction
only
over
final
orders,
This court
28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2012);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b);
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
v.
The
order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?