Antonio Davis v. Sara Giron

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cv-03429-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999721066]. Mailed to: Antonio Davis. [15-7560]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7560 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7560 ANTONIO DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEP. SARA GIRON, Defendant – Appellee, and RICHLAND COUNTY; SHERIFF LEON LOTT; DEP. ADRIAN THOMPSON; DEP. ADAM CORNWELL; RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:12-cv-03429-RMG) Submitted: December 15, 2015 Before GREGORY Circuit Judge. and FLOYD, Decided: Circuit Judges, Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. December 18, 2015 and DAVIS, Senior Appeal: 15-7560 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Antonio Davis, Appellant Pro Se. David Allan DeMasters, Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-7560 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/18/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Antonio Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellee Sara Giron. may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, This court 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). v. The order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?