US v. Reginald Avent

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:99-cr-00011-RAJ-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999761871]. Mailed to: Reginald Avent. [15-7566]

Appeal: 15-7566

Doc: 14

Filed: 02/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7566

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD LEVI AVENT,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:99-cr-00011-RAJ-1)

Submitted:

February 5, 2016

Decided:

February 25, 2016

Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Levi Avent, Appellant Pro Se.
Dana James Boente,
Acting United States Attorney, Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7566

Doc: 14

Filed: 02/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Reginald

Levi

Avent

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C.
Amend. 782 (2015).
reversible

error

We have reviewed the record and find no

because

Amendment

782

is

not

applicable

to

sentences, such as Avent’s sentence, derived from the career
offender provisions in the Sentencing Guidelines.

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States

v.

2015).
legal
before

Avent,

No.

2:99-cr-00011-RAJ-1

(E.D.

Va.

United

Feb.

27,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2