Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03692-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999765106]. Mailed to: Robert Cooper. [15-7573]

Appeal: 15-7573

Doc: 12

Filed: 03/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7573

ROBERT COOPER,
Plaintiff - appellant,
v.
BRAD BRINEGAR; C. or F. DAVIS, B. PAYTON; CPL. LOGSDON; CPL.
WILBURN; CPL. BARB; CPL. HENDRICKS; CHIEF MICHAEL P. THOMAS;
CPL. S. A. WILSON; CPL. R. CONNER; CPL. J. FONTAIN; CPL. HETZ;
CPL. M. DAVIS; OFFICER HENDRICKS; S. DILLEY; RONALD SHANE
WEBER; FRANK BISHOP, JR.,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SECRETARY GREGG HERSHBERGER; SERGEANT CRUMPAC,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03692-JFM)

Submitted:

February 25, 2016

Decided:

March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-7573

Doc: 12

Filed: 03/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Robert Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7573

Doc: 12

Filed: 03/01/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Robert Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Cooper seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3