US v. Dan Gatlin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999682284-2]; granting in part and denying in part Motion to seal informal brief [999682281-2]. Originating case number: 4:10-cr-00203-TLW-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999758855]. Mailed to: Dan Gatlin. [15-7583]

Appeal: 15-7583

Doc: 14

Filed: 02/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAN GATLIN,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:10-cr-00203-TLW-1)

Submitted:

February 9, 2016

Decided:

February 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dan Gatlin, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Greenville,
South
Carolina,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7583

Doc: 14

Filed: 02/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dan Gatlin appeals the district court’s order granting him
a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). ∗
have

reviewed

Accordingly,

we

the

record

deny

and

Gatlin’s

find

motion

no
to

reversible
appoint

We

error.

counsel

and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See United

States

Sept.

v.

Gatlin,

No.

2015; Oct. 8, 2015).

4:10-cr-00203-TLW-1

(D.S.C.

22,

We grant in part and deny in part Gatlin’s

motion to seal his informal brief on appeal by sealing pages 4,
5, and 9-11 of the brief but not sealing the remaining pages.
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗

Gatlin challenges the extent of the reduction.

2