James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999766208]. Mailed to: appellant. [15-7589]
Appeal: 15-7589
Doc: 8
Filed: 03/02/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7589
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HYLTON, CDUSM, U. S. Marshal Service; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff;
STERNS, Chief; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY - ALEXANDRIA (VA);
K. PEDERSEN, AUSA, EDVA; F. MILANO, Captain; J. COREY;
G. HUNTER;
LIEUTENANT
M.
JOSIAH;
DIRECTOR,
American
Correctional Association; C. M. HILTON, USDJ, EDVA; EDWARD
SEMONIAN, Circuit Court Clerk; R. STERNS, Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM)
Submitted:
February 16, 2016
Decided:
March 2, 2016
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7589
Doc: 8
Filed: 03/02/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)
(2012) for failure to state a claim.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Roudabush v. Hylton, No.
2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2015).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?