US v. Monique Arp

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999752670]. Mailed to: Monique Michelle Arp. [15-7593]

Appeal: 15-7593

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/10/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7593

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MONIQUE MICHELLE ARP,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1)

Submitted:

February 5, 2016

Decided:

February 10, 2016

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique Michelle Arp, Appellant Pro Se.
Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7593

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/10/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Monique

Michelle

Arp

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction based on U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C,
Amend. 782 (2015).

We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error because Arp’s sentence was the result of a Fed.
R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement.

Arp’s stipulated sentence

was not based on the Sentencing Guidelines, so Amendment 782 does
not apply.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Arp, No. 4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1

(D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2