Ahmad Muhammad-Ali v. Ku Kluxs Klans

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999682255-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00308-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999723400]. Mailed to: Ahmad Muhammad-Ali COLUMBIA CARE CENTER 7901 Farrow Road Columbia, SC 29203-0000. [15-7596]

Appeal: 15-7596

Doc: 8

Filed: 12/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7596

AHMAD MUHAMMAD-ALI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KU KLUXS KLANS; CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; AIKEN COUNTY; SOUTH
CAROLINA, THE STATE OF; AIKEN PUBLIC SAFETY; AIKEN COUNTY
SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; NORTH AUGUSTA PUBLIC SAFETY; BUCANAN
AUTO; DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH; AIKEN COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-00308-MGL)

Submitted:

December 17, 2015

Decided:

December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad Muhammad-Ali, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7596

Doc: 8

Filed: 12/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ahmad

Muhammad-Ali

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to

28

U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B)

(2012).

The

magistrate

judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Muhammad-Ali that
failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could
waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.

Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

Muhammad-Ali has waived appellate

review by failing to file specific objections after receiving
proper

notice.

Accordingly,

we

affirm

the

judgment

of

the

district court.
We deny Muhammad-Ali’s motion for transcripts at government
expense.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
2