James Meshach Lomax v. Colin Ottey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-02180-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999775361]. Mailed to: James Meshach Lomax ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 18701 Roxbury Road Hagerstown, MD 21746-9540 Carolyn Israel Stein Serra Aygun. [15-7597]
Appeal: 15-7597
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/16/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7597
JAMES MESHACH LOMAX,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COLIN OTTEY, M.D.; GREG FLURY, P.A.; FRANK BISHOP, Warden;
BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Former Warden; R. RODERICK, Case
Management Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:14-cv-02180-DKC)
Submitted:
March 14, 2016
Decided:
March 16, 2016
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Serra Aygun, Carolyn
Israel Stein, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP,
Washington,
D.C.;
Elizabeth
Erin
Pavlick,
UNITED
STATES
DEPARTMENT
OF
DEFENSE,
Washington,
D.C.;
Nichole
Cherie
Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7597
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/16/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
Meshach
Lomax
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Lomax v. Ottey, No. 8:14-cv-02180-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug.
4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?