Marvin X. Damon v. Bart Masters
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-26833 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999788596]. Mailed to: Marvin Jerome Damon FCI HAZELTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 5000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525. [15-7619]
Appeal: 15-7619
Doc: 34
Filed: 04/05/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7619
MARVIN X. DAMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BART
MASTERS,
Warden;
JOHN
BOWLING,
Food
Administrator;
J.
TABOR,
Assistant
Food
Administrator; JOHN BOYD, Food Service Employee,
Service
Service
Defendants - Appellees.
-------------------------------------RODERICK AND SOLANGE MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER; AMERICAN
CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; ACLU OF WEST VIRGINIA FOUNDATION,
Amici Supporting Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-26833)
Submitted:
March 31, 2016
Decided:
April 5, 2016
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin X. Damon, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
David M. Shapiro, RODERICK AND SOLANGE MACARTHUR
Appeal: 15-7619
Doc: 34
Filed: 04/05/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
JUSTICE CENTER, Chicago, Illinois; David C. Fathi, AMERICAN
CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Washington, D.C.; Jamie Lynn Crofts, ACLU
OF WEST VIRGINIA FOUNDATION, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Amici Supporting Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7619
Doc: 34
Filed: 04/05/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Marvin
Jerome
Damon
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),
and the magistrate judge’s order denying discovery.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Damon
v. Masters, No. 1:14-cv-26833 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 25, 2015; Sept.
18, 2015).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?