John Anderson, Jr. v. Portsmouth City
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00604-AWA-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999785793]. Mailed to: John Anderson, Jr. [15-7639]
Appeal: 15-7639
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7639
JOHN EDWARD ANDERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PORTSMOUTH CITY; SHERIFF WILLIAM WATSON; LIEUTENANT KEESE,
Acting subordinate of the Sheriff; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; JANE
DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL; AMY KIRBY,
Public Defender; MATTHEW JOHNSON, Senior Assistant Public
Defender; JOYCE L. WEDDLE, Deputy Public Defender,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00604-AWA-LRL)
Submitted:
March 29, 2016
Decided:
March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 15-7639
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
John Edward Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cheran Denise
Cordell, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Portsmouth, Virginia;
Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7639
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
John
Anderson,
Jr.,
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing Anderson’s
complaint.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
(E.D.
Va.
Sept.
Anderson v. Virginia, No. 2:14-cv-00604-AWA-LRL
15,
2015).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?