John Anderson, Jr. v. Portsmouth City

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00604-AWA-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999785793]. Mailed to: John Anderson, Jr. [15-7639]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7639 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7639 JOHN EDWARD ANDERSON, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PORTSMOUTH CITY; SHERIFF WILLIAM WATSON; LIEUTENANT KEESE, Acting subordinate of the Sheriff; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants – Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL; AMY KIRBY, Public Defender; MATTHEW JOHNSON, Senior Assistant Public Defender; JOYCE L. WEDDLE, Deputy Public Defender, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00604-AWA-LRL) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 15-7639 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 John Edward Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cheran Denise Cordell, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Portsmouth, Virginia; Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-7639 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: John Anderson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing Anderson’s complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. Va. Sept. Anderson v. Virginia, No. 2:14-cv-00604-AWA-LRL 15, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?