US v. Arturo Baza
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:06-cr-00116-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999777272]. Mailed to: Arturo Baza. [15-7644]
Appeal: 15-7644
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/18/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7644
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARTURO NAVARRO BAZA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:06-cr-00116-BO-1)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Decided:
March 18, 2016
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arturo Navarro Baza, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7644
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/18/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Arturo
Navarro
Baza
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Baza, No. 7:06-cr-00116-BO-1 (E.D.N.C.
Oct. 5, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?