US v. Furman Quattlebaum

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-17. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999789558]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-7663]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7663 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/06/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7663 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00548-CMC-17) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, and April 6, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, John C. Potterfield, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7663 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/06/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), denying reviewed the his record motion and find for reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. have and no See United States v. Quattlebaum, No. 3:02-cr-00548- CMC-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2015; filed Sept. 30, 2015, entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?