US v. Raymond Brown, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999785572]. Mailed to: appellant and Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe. [15-7670]
Appeal: 15-7670
Doc: 7
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND N. BROWN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11)
Submitted:
March 29, 2016
Decided:
March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond N. Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward
Bradenham, II, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Amy Elizabeth Cross, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7670
Doc: 7
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond N. Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting
in
part
his
reduction of sentence.
reversible error.
by
the
district
18
U.S.C.
§ 3582
(2012)
motion
for
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.
United
States
v.
Brown,
4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11 (E.D. Va. June 3, 2015).
No.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?