US v. Raymond Brown, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999785572]. Mailed to: appellant and Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe. [15-7670]

Appeal: 15-7670

Doc: 7

Filed: 03/31/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND N. BROWN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11)

Submitted:

March 29, 2016

Decided:

March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond N. Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward
Bradenham, II, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Amy Elizabeth Cross, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7670

Doc: 7

Filed: 03/31/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Raymond N. Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting

in

part

his

reduction of sentence.
reversible error.
by

the

district

18

U.S.C.

§ 3582

(2012)

motion

for

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.

United

States

v.

Brown,

4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11 (E.D. Va. June 3, 2015).

No.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2