US v. Jose Fuente

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999756798-2], denying Motion for other relief [999716353-2] Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00114-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999802821]. Mailed to: Jose Fuentes. [15-7717]

Appeal: 15-7717

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7717

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSE M. FUENTES, a/k/a Jose Fuentes Mayoral,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:03-cr-00114-HEH-1)

Submitted:

April 21, 2016

Decided:

April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose M. Fuentes, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Arthur Garnett,
Stephen
Wiley
Miller,
Assistant
United
States
Attorneys,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7717

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jose M. Fuentes appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction
based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
(2014).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district

court.

See

United

States

00114-HEH–1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2015).
for

oral

argument

Government expense.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

and

for

copies

v.

Fuentes,

No.

3:03–cr–

We deny Fuentes’ motions
of

criminal

records

at

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2