Henry Martin, Jr. v. Myecha Miley


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:13-cv-03516-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999738699]. Mailed to: Martin. [15-7726]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7726 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7726 HENRY W. MARTIN, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CPT MYECHA MILEY, Defendant – Appellee, and WILLIAM R. BYARS; JOHN R. PATE; ARTHUR A. JORDAN; MCKENNDLY NEWTON; ROBERT E. WARD; JON OZMINT; DENNIS PATTERSON; DANIEL MURPHY; DAVID M. TATARSKY; LT J. CARUJO; LT J. CARTER; ROBERT ORR; LT JAMES RUMP; CAPTAIN E. J. MILLER; DR. THOMAS BYNSE; LT VARLEASE BLACK; CPL L. JENKINS; M. HUDSON; S. SINGLATON, DHO; CPL T. SIMPSON; MR. MCQUEEN; P. SMITH; A. HOLLMAN; HELEN FREEMAN; THOMAS SCOTT; CPT E. JAMES; TANYA A. GEE; V. CLAIRE ALLEN; JOHN C. FEW; WAYNE C. MCCABE; JILL BEATTIE; JEANNETTE MACK; FRANCINE BAUCHMAN; PATTY BRITT POSEY; JAMES S. SLIGH, JR.; DR. ROWLAND; GREGORY S. LINE; CHARLOTTE SMITH; ELLEN GOODWIN; RUSSELL RUSH; JIM CROSBY; SUSAN BARDEN; VIRGINIA CROCKER; PAM SMITH; LAKETA DIKA; DEBORAH B. DURDEN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:13-cv-03516-TMC) Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016 Appeal: 15-7726 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Freeman, Sr., GRIFFITH, SHARP & LIIPFERT, LLC, Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-7726 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying complaint. error. relief on Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oct. 8, 2015). Martin v. Miley, No. 6:13-cv-03516-TMC (D.S.C. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?