Anton Johnson v. Charles Ratledge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999717908-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999702819-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02250-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999799971]. Mailed to: Anton Johnson. [15-7731]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7731 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7731 ANTON JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02250-BO) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anton Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7731 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anton Johnson, a District of Columbia Code offender civilly committed under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (2012), appeals the district court’s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. order We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02250-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 19, 2015; entered Oct. 20, 2015). counsel is denied. facts and materials legal before Johnson’s motion for appointment of We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?