Larnell Hendrick v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [999719027-2] Originating case number: 8:14-cv-02544-TDC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999787787]. Mailed to: Larnell Hendrick. [15-7745]

Appeal: 15-7745

Doc: 19

Filed: 04/04/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7745

LARNELL HENDRICK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FRANK B. BISHOP, NBCI Warden, in their individual and
official
capacities;
LIEUTENANT
SAWYERS,
in
their
individual and official capacities; SERGEANT G. FORNEY, in
their individual and official capacities; CO II SOLTAS, in
their individual and official capacities; CO II ANDERSON,
in their individual and official capacities; BILL BEEMAN,
NBCI Medical Director, in their individual and official
capacities; DR. AVA JOUBERT, M.D.; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES,
INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-02544-TDC)

Submitted:

March 21, 2016

Decided:

April 4, 2016

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larnell Hendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,
RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland; Ankush Nayar,

Appeal: 15-7745

Doc: 19

Filed: 04/04/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7745

Doc: 19

Filed: 04/04/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Larnell Hendrick seeks to appeal the district court’s order
resolving several of Hendrick’s claims in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) action.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen

v.

545-46 (1949).

Beneficial

Indus.

Loan

Corp.,

337

U.S.

541,

The order Hendrick seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
DISMISSED

3