Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi v. Terry McAuliffe


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999786875]. Mailed to: Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi RED ONION STATE PRISON 10800 H. Jack Rose Highway P. O. Box 970 Pound, VA 24279-0000. [15-7748]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7748 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7748 ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TERRY MCAULIFFE, Virginia Governor; HARVEY BRYANT, Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; KATHERINE ORSINI, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; CATHERINE DODSON, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; CALVIN DEPEW, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; LEAH DARRON, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia; PETER LEGLER, Virginia Beach Public Defender; ANNET MILLER, Virginia Beach Public Defender; BENJAMIN THOMAS REED, Court Appointed Defense Attorney; SHEPHERD WAINGER, Direct Appeal Attorney; J. BRADLEY REAVES, Direct Appeal Attorney; DAVID EBERHARDT, State Department; RICHARD E. LUBOW, State Department; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; EDWARD HANSON, Virginia Beach Circuit Court Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 15-7748 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-7748 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reasons reversible stated by error. the district we court. affirm See for Makdessi the v. McAuliffe, No. 3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 2015). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?