Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi v. Terry McAuliffe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999786875]. Mailed to: Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi RED ONION STATE PRISON 10800 H. Jack Rose Highway P. O. Box 970 Pound, VA 24279-0000. [15-7748]
Appeal: 15-7748
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7748
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TERRY
MCAULIFFE,
Virginia
Governor;
HARVEY
BRYANT,
Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; KATHERINE ORSINI,
Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; CATHERINE
DODSON, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach;
CALVIN DEPEW, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia
Beach; LEAH DARRON, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia;
PETER LEGLER, Virginia Beach Public Defender; ANNET MILLER,
Virginia Beach Public Defender; BENJAMIN THOMAS REED, Court
Appointed Defense Attorney; SHEPHERD WAINGER, Direct Appeal
Attorney; J. BRADLEY REAVES, Direct Appeal Attorney; DAVID
EBERHARDT, State Department; RICHARD E. LUBOW, State
Department; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; EDWARD HANSON,
Virginia Beach Circuit Court Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY)
Submitted:
March 29, 2016
Decided:
April 1, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 15-7748
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7748
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/01/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Adib
Eddie
Ramez
Makdessi
appeals
the
district
court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012).
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reasons
reversible
stated
by
error.
the
district
we
court.
affirm
See
for
Makdessi
the
v.
McAuliffe, No. 3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 2015).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?