US v. Jerome Smith
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cr-00217-REP-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999802779]. Mailed to: Jerome Smith. [15-7778]
Appeal: 15-7778
Doc: 9
Filed: 04/25/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7778
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEROME SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cr-00217-REP-1)
Submitted:
April 21, 2016
Decided:
April 25, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Eugene Anthony, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7778
Doc: 9
Filed: 04/25/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Smith appeals the district court’s order granting his
motion for a reduction in his sentence based on a retroactive
amendment
to
the
Sentencing
proportionate reduction.
Guidelines
and
imposing
a
On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Smith has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?