US v. Yulian Carillo-Tamayo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00563-MBS-2. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999763006]. Mailed to: Yulian Carillo-Tamayo. [15-7783]

Appeal: 15-7783

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/26/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
YULIAN CARILLO-TAMAYO, a/k/a Frank,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cr-00563-MBS-2)

Submitted:

February 23, 2016

Decided:

February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yulian Carillo-Tamayo, Appellant Pro Se.
Stanley D. Ragsdale,
Jane
Barrett
Taylor,
Assistant
United
States
Attorneys,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7783

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/26/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Yulian

Carillo-Tamayo

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.
00563-MBS-2

United States v. Carillo-Tamayo, No. 5:12-cr-

(D.S.C.

Oct.

26,

2015).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2