US v. Roderick Black
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999800120]. Mailed to: Roderick Black. [15-7787]
Appeal: 15-7787
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7787
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODERICK BLACK, a/k/a Roger,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.
Terrence W.
Boyle, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00015-BO-9)
Submitted:
April 19, 2016
Decided:
April 21, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward D. Gray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7787
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick
Black
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a
clerical error in his presentence investigation report.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States
v.
2015).
legal
before
Black,
No.
2:94-cr-00015-BO-9
(E.D.N.C.
United
Oct.
20,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?