US v. Samuel Crook

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999786775]. Mailed to: Samuel Paul Crook. [15-7791, 15-7793]

Appeal: 15-7791

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-7793

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge.
(3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOCDSC-1)

Submitted:

March 29, 2016

Decided:

April 1, 2016

Appeal: 15-7791

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se.
Craig Darren Randall,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7791

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/01/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Crook appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motions filed in his related criminal cases.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1;

3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1

(W.D.N.C.

Oct.

21,

2015).

Crook’s motion for appointment of counsel.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We

deny

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3