William Sims v. Unknown
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999713624-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00533-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999763025]. Mailed to: W. Sims. [15-7816]
Appeal: 15-7816
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/26/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7816
WILLIAM T. SIMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00533-GBL-IDD)
Submitted:
February 23, 2016
Decided:
February 26, 2016
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. Sims, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7816
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/26/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
Sims
the
PER CURIAM:
William
T.
appeals
district
court’s
order
dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply
with a court order. *
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Sims v. Unknown, No. 1:15-cv-00533-GBL-
IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2015).
We deny Sims’ motion to appoint
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court dismissed Sims’ complaint
without prejudice, we possess jurisdiction over this appeal
because the dismissal was based on Sims’ failure to comply with
a court order, not on account of a flaw in the complaint.
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d
1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?