William Sims v. Unknown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999713624-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00533-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999763025]. Mailed to: W. Sims. [15-7816]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7816 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/26/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7816 WILLIAM T. SIMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00533-GBL-IDD) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William T. Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7816 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/26/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 Sims the PER CURIAM: William T. appeals district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a court order. * reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sims v. Unknown, No. 1:15-cv-00533-GBL- IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2015). We deny Sims’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the district court dismissed Sims’ complaint without prejudice, we possess jurisdiction over this appeal because the dismissal was based on Sims’ failure to comply with a court order, not on account of a flaw in the complaint. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?