US v. John Hamilton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999716901-2] Originating case number: 1:95-cr-00174-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999802864]. Mailed to: John Hamilton. [15-7822]

Appeal: 15-7822

Doc: 15

Filed: 04/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7822

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN HAMILTON, a/k/a Majestick,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:95-cr-00174-1)

Submitted:

April 21, 2016

Decided:

April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se.
Gary L. Call, John J.
Frail,
Steven
Loew,
Assistant
United
States
Attorneys,
Charleston, West Virginia; John Lanier File, Assistant United
States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; John Castle Parr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7822

Doc: 15

Filed: 04/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John Hamilton appeals the district court’s order denying
his

18

U.S.C.

reduction.
error.

§ 3582(c)(2)

(2012)

motion

for

a

sentence

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Hamilton, No. 1:95-cr-00174-1

(S.D.W. Va. Nov. 6, 2015).

We deny Hamilton’s motion to appoint

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2