Robert Holland Koon v. Jean Toal

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999701929-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-02944-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999766239]. Mailed to: Robert Holland Koon LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472-0000. [15-7836]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7836 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7836 ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEAN TOAL, Chief Judicial Officer of South Carolina, in her official capacity; ALAN WILSON, Chief Solicitor of South Carolina, in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:15-cv-02944-DCN) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7836 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert accepting Holland the Koon appeals recommendation of the the district court’s magistrate order judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Koon’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 26, 2015). Koon v. Toal, No. 4:15-cv-02944-DCN (D.S.C. Oct. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?