Antoinne Smith v. Sergeant E. Watkin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999742168-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999772602-2]; terminating Motion to compel [999772602-3] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-03893-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999804233]. Mailed to: Antoinne Smith. [15-7907]

Appeal: 15-7907

Doc: 25

Filed: 04/26/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7907

ANTOINNE SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT E. WATKINS,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
ROBERT
GREEN,
FACILITY,

Warden;

MONTGOMERY

COUNTY

CORRECTIONAL

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13cv-03893-PWG)

Submitted:

April 21, 2016

Decided:

April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoinne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lowell
Edward B. Lattner, Jody Lynn Malmstrom, COUNTY
OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Frederick,
ATTORNEY’S

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7907

Doc: 25

Filed: 04/26/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antoinne Smith appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.

Smith v. Sergeant

Watkins, No. 8:13-cv-03893-PWG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2015).
deny Smith’s motion to assign counsel.

We also

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2