Minyard Davis v. William Watson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999760362-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00146-RAJ-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999836785]. Mailed to: M. Davis. [15-7953]

Appeal: 15-7953

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/31/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7953

MINYARD CASS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM B. WATSON, Sheriff; TAYLOR, Deputy Sheriff; FAULK,
Deputy Sheriff; M. DAVIS, Deputy Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-00146-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted:

May 26, 2016

Decided:

May 31, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Minyard Cass Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia
Appellees.

Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W.
Beach, Virginia, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7953

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/31/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Minyard

Cass

Davis

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss
and

dismissing

Davis’

42

failure to state a claim.
no reversible error.

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint

for

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

See Davis v. Watson, No. 2:15-cv-

00146-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2015).

We deny Davis’ motion

for oral argument via videoconference.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2