US v. Gregg Braxton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cr-00187-HEH-MHL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999828637]. Mailed to: G. Braxton. [15-7964]

Appeal: 15-7964

Doc: 8

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7964

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GREGG BRAXTON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:08-cr-00187-HEH-MHL-1)

Submitted:

May 18, 2016

Decided:

May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregg Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7964

Doc: 8

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gregg
denying

Braxton

his

Amendment

18

782.

reversible error.
by

the

district

appeals

U.S.C.
We

from

the

§ 3582(c)(2)

have

reviewed

district
(2012)
the

court’s

motion

record

and

order

based

on

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.

United

States

v.

Braxton,

3:08-cr-00187-HEH-MHL-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2015).

No.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2