Kenjay Brown v. Justin Andrew


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999737631-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02200-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000092592]. Mailed to: Kenjay Brown. [15-7973]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7973 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/01/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7973 KENJAY ALBERT BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:15-hc-02200-F) Submitted: May 11, 2017 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenjay Albert Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 1, 2017 Appeal: 15-7973 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/01/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kenjay Albert Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Andrews, No. 5:15-hc-02200F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?