Momolu Sirleaf v. C. Wall
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999737648-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999737652-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00338-MHL-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Momolu Sirleaf. [15-8017]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside Chaplin Services, Inc., sued
individually and in official capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Roderick Charles Young,
Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00338-MHL-RCY)
February 5, 2016
February 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Sirleaf seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny Sirleaf’s pending
motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?