US v. Angelo Galloway

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cr-00096-MSD-TEM-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999762967].. [15-8018]

Appeal: 15-8018

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/26/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANGELO GALLOWAY, a/k/a Gelo,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:10-cr-00096-MSD-TEM-2)

Submitted:

February 23, 2016

Decided:

February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant
United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-8018

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/26/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Angelo Galloway appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

At this juncture, Galloway

can no longer seek relief from his guilty plea pursuant to Fed.
R. Crim. P. 11.

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e).

motion

could

construed

(2012)

motion,

be

the

as

a

district

successive

court

lacked

Insofar as his

28

U.S.C.

§ 2255

jurisdiction

to

consider it.

See United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 397 (4th

Cir. 2015).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

We

with

dispense

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2