Momolu Sirleaf v. David Robinson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999737609-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999737614-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00340-MHL-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999756269]. Mailed to: Momolu Sirleaf. [15-8022]

Appeal: 15-8022

Doc: 12

Filed: 02/17/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8022

MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, VDOC, sued individually
and in official capacity; C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside
Chaplin Services, Inc., sued individually and in official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Roderick Charles Young,
Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00340-MHL-RCY)

Submitted:

February 5, 2016

Decided:

February 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-8022

Doc: 12

Filed: 02/17/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order

denying

prejudice.
orders

his

motion

for

appointment

of

counsel

without

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

of

the

district

court,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1291

(2012),

and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

The order Sirleaf seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order.

Accordingly, we deny Sirleaf’s pending

motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2