Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03795-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999904214]. Mailed to: Anthony Kelly. [15-8026]
Appeal: 15-8026
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/04/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-8026
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-03795-RDB)
Submitted:
July 28, 2016
Decided:
August 4, 2016
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-8026
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/04/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Quentin Kelly seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint without prejudice.
may
exercise
jurisdiction
only
over
final
This court
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28
U.S.C.
§
1292
(2012);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b);
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
v.
The
order Kelly seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67
(4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction
remand
and
the
case
to
the
district
court
with
instructions to allow Kelly to file an amended complaint.
See
Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 630 (4th
Cir. 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?