John Baccus v. Brian Stirling

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999792556-2], denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999789629-2]; denying Motion for judicial notice [999783894-2]; denying Motion for disposition of informal briefing [999774981-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999776976-2]; denying Motion to compel [999744967-2]; denying Motion to file amicus curiae brief [999744963-2] Originating case number: 9:15-cv-02670-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999804346]. Mailed to: John Baccus. [15-8030]

Appeal: 15-8030

Doc: 28

Filed: 04/26/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8030

JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRIAN P. STIRLING; D. EASTRIDGE; OTHERS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
David C. Norton, District Judge.
(9:15-cv-02670-DCN)

Submitted:

April 21, 2016

Decided:

April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-8030

Doc: 28

Filed: 04/26/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order
accepting

the

recommendation
U.S.C.

the

§ 1983

magistrate

(2012)

judge

complaint

and

dismissing

his

prejudice.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

42

of

without

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district

court.

Baccus v.

Stirling,

No.

9:15-cv-02670-DCN

(D.S.C. filed Dec. 9, 2015; entered Dec. 10, 2015).

We deny all

of Baccus’s pending motions, including his motions for bail, to
file

an

amicus

videotapes,

for

curiae
a

brief,

to

transcript

at

compel

the

government

production

of

expense,

for

disposition of informal briefing, and for judicial notice of his
informal
facts

brief.

and

materials

legal
before

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

because

presented

would

not

the

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2