DeAnthony Doane v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to submit an affidavit in response to the district court's judgment [999745737-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999745746-2], denying Motion for an order compelling discovery [999745752-2]. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00539-GEC-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999910938]. Mailed to: DeAnthony Doane. [15-8040]

Appeal: 15-8040

Doc: 22

Filed: 08/16/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8040

DEANTHONY DOANE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, VDOC Director; LESLIE FLEMING, KMCC Warden;
J. H. ROBBIN, Sergeant KMCC; C/O R. W. DOWDY, KMCC; C/O E.
M. WALK, KMCC; C/O M. CORDLE, KMCC; C/O J. SHELTON, KMCC,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00539-GEC-RSB)

Submitted:

August 8, 2016

Decided:

August 16, 2016

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAnthony Doane, Appellant Pro Se.
Nancy Hull Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-8040

Doc: 22

Filed: 08/16/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
DeAnthony Doane appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

Doane v.
2015).

for

the

Clarke,

reasons

No.

stated

by

the

7:14-cv-00539-GEC-RSB

We

Accordingly,

district

(W.D.

have

Va.

court.
Dec.

8,

The motions to submit an affidavit in response to the

district court’s judgment, for an order compelling discovery,
and for appointment of counsel are denied.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2