Daniel A. Roberts v. Virginia Beach Court House

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to reconsider [999794603-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00510-RGD-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999901238]. Mailed to: Daniel A. Roberts P. O. Box 222 South Windham, CT 06266. [16-1008]

Appeal: 16-1008

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1008

DANIEL A. ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA BEACH COURT HOUSE; CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00510-RGD-RJK)

Submitted:

July 28, 2016

Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.

HARRIS,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

August 1, 2016

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel A. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1008

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Daniel

A.

Roberts

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2012).
appeal,

we

confine

Appellant’s brief.
informal

brief

our

review

to

the

issues

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

does

not

challenge

the

raised

in

On
the

Because Roberts’
district

court’s

dispositive analysis, Roberts has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d

423,

Cir.

430

district

n.4

(4th

court’s

reconsider.

2004).

judgment.

Accordingly,
We

deny

we

affirm

the

Roberts’

motion

to

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2