Robinson Williams v. Cheesecake Factory Restaurant


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999745670-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03700-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999862934]. Mailed to: Robinson Williams. [16-1014]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1014 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1014 ROBINSON A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY RESTAURANTS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03700-ELH) Submitted: June 16, 2016 Decided: June 22, 2016 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robinson A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Butz, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Justin McArthur Cuniff, Christy Ann Fisher, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1014 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robinson A. Williams appeals the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2012) conspiracy action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Cheesecake Factory Rest., Inc., No. 1:15-cv- 03700-ELH (D. Md. filed Dec. 8, 2015; entered Dec. 9, 2015). We also deny as moot Williams’ motion to stay pending appeal. We dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?