In Re: Victor Perkin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999734782-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999749474-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999734783-2] Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03189-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999828613]. Mailed to: Victor Perkins. [16-1040]

Appeal: 16-1040

Doc: 11

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1040

In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:15-ct-03189-D)

Submitted:

May 18, 2016

Decided:

May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1040

Doc: 11

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Victor

B.

Perkins

petitions

for

a

writ

of

mandamus,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his complaint

filed

pursuant

to

Bivens

v.

Six

Unknown

Named

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

He

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act.

Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, on

March

2,

judge’s

2016,

district

recommendation

Accordingly,
Perkins’

the

because

case,

we

and

the

court

dismissed

district

deny

the

accepted

court

mandamus

the

Perkins’
has

magistrate
complaint.

recently

petition

and

decided
amended

petition as moot.

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

We

oral

dispense

contentions

with
are

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2