In re: Peter Bernegger

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999736661-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999801160]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-1055]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1055 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1055 In re: PETER BERNEGGER, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Bernegger, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1055 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Peter Bernegger appeals the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 27(a) petition. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma papueris and affirm the district court’s order. In re: Peter Bernegger, No. 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?