Gordon Beasley v. Red Rock Financial Service


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01497-GBL-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000056312].. [16-1063]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1063 Doc: 60 Filed: 04/05/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1063 GORDON BEASLEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, and JANET BEASLEY, Plaintiff, v. RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; RED ROCK VIRGINIA, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01497-GBL-JFA) Submitted: March 28, 2017 Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: April 5, 2017 Appeal: 16-1063 Doc: 60 Filed: 04/05/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Ernest P. Francis, ERNEST P. FRANCIS, LTD., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Virginia M. Sadler, Padraic K. Keane, JORDAN COYNE LLP, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1063 Doc: 60 Filed: 04/05/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Gordon Beasley appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on some of his claims, denying his motion for summary judgment on one of the Appellees’ defenses, and granting judgment as a matter of law for the Appellees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) after Beasley’s presentation of his remaining claims to the jury. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?