Carol Jefferson v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999743522-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02275-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999970818]. Mailed to: C Jefferson. [16-1086]

Appeal: 16-1086

Doc: 19

Filed: 11/18/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1086

CAROL JEFFERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:15-cv-02275-DKC)

Submitted:

October 18, 2016

Decided:

November 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leland Alan Stark, Santa Monica, California, for Appellant.
Christy Ann Fisher, John Christopher Nosher, BONNER KIERNAN
TREBACH & CROCIATA LLP, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1086

Doc: 19

Filed: 11/18/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Carol

Jefferson

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

dismissing her complaint for insufficient service of process and
denying her motion for reconsideration.
record and

find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the
Accordingly,

we

grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.

Jefferson v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger

Corp., No. 8:15-cv-02275-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 21, 2015; Dec. 23,
2015).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2