In re: Antonio Mosley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus in part (FRAP 21) [999745604-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999755653-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999755655-2]. Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00399-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999846663]. Mailed to: Antonio Mosley. [16-1093]

Appeal: 16-1093

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/08/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1093

In Re:

ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00399-RJC)

Submitted:

May 12, 2016

Decided:

June 8, 2016

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per
curiam opinion.

Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1093

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/08/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) action in ruling on his motion for access to sealed court
records and his motion for bond.

He further claims that the

district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction.
Because the district court’s criminal docket reveals that the
court denied Mosley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on February 5, 2016, we
dismiss Mosley’s mandamus petition in part as moot.

Moreover, our

review of the civil docket does not reveal undue delay in the
district court.
part.

Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition in

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny

Mosley’s motion for release on bail.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART

2