In re: Antonio Mosley
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus in part (FRAP 21) [999745604-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999755653-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999755655-2]. Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00399-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Antonio Mosley. [16-1093]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
May 12, 2016
June 8, 2016
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per
Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) action in ruling on his motion for access to sealed court
records and his motion for bond.
He further claims that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction.
Because the district court’s criminal docket reveals that the
court denied Mosley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on February 5, 2016, we
dismiss Mosley’s mandamus petition in part as moot.
review of the civil docket does not reveal undue delay in the
Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition in
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny
Mosley’s motion for release on bail.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?