In re: Antonio Mosley


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus in part (FRAP 21) [999745604-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999755653-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999755655-2]. Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00399-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999846663]. Mailed to: Antonio Mosley. [16-1093]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1093 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/08/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1093 In Re: ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00399-RJC) Submitted: May 12, 2016 Decided: June 8, 2016 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1093 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/08/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) action in ruling on his motion for access to sealed court records and his motion for bond. He further claims that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. Because the district court’s criminal docket reveals that the court denied Mosley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on February 5, 2016, we dismiss Mosley’s mandamus petition in part as moot. Moreover, our review of the civil docket does not reveal undue delay in the district court. part. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition in We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Mosley’s motion for release on bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?