Sukcha Tharp v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999941908]. [16-1094]

Appeal: 16-1094

Doc: 36

Filed: 10/05/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1094

SUKCHA THARP,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LORETTA
E.
LYNCH,
Attorney
General;
UNITED
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Agency,

STATES

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN)

Submitted:

September 15, 2016

Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

and

October 5, 2016

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard F. Hawkins, III, HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant.
Dana J. Boente, United States
Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1094

Doc: 36

Filed: 10/05/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sukcha Tharp appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’
summary

motion

judgment,

to
on

dismiss

or,

Tharp’s

in

the

discrimination,

alternative,

for

harassment

and

retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(2012),

and

the

Rehabilitation

Act

of

1973,

as

amended,

U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm the district court’s judgment.

29

We have

Accordingly,

Tharp v. Lynch, No.

1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2015).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2