In re: Andre Whitfield

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999747028-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999752267-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00441-HEH-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999794333].. [16-1105]

Appeal: 16-1105

Doc: 6

Filed: 04/13/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1105

In Re:

ANDRE D. WHITFIELD,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:15-cv-00441-HEH-RCY)

Submitted:

April 4, 2016

Decided:

April 13, 2016

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre D. Whitfield, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1105

Doc: 6

Filed: 04/13/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Andre D. Whitfield filed a petition for writ of mandamus,
seeking an order directing the district court to issue a ruling
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.

The district court

issued its final order in the § 2241 action on February 19,
2016.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and deny the mandamus petition as moot.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2