William Davis, Jr. v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999764585-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999764585-3]. Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00062-RBS-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999871509]. Mailed to: William Davis, Jr. [16-1106]
Appeal: 16-1106
Doc: 9
Filed: 06/28/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1106
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., and a minor child JFD, as next
best friend,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00062-RBS-DEM)
Submitted:
June 14, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
June 28, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1106
Doc: 9
Filed: 06/28/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William
Scott
Davis,
Jr.,
appeals
the
district
court’s
order denying his motion to reopen a closed Federal Tort Claims
Act matter.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Davis v. United States, No. 4:13-cv-00062-RBS-
DEM (E.D. Va. July 16, 2015).
We deny Davis’ motions to remand
and for appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?