Judy Miskell v. Harry Chase

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00019-CCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999801184]. Mailed to: Judy Miskell. [16-1108]

Appeal: 16-1108

Doc: 7

Filed: 04/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1108

JUDY KAY MISKELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HARRY L. CHASE; WILLIAM L. HAUGH, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00019-CCB)

Submitted:

April 19, 2016

Decided:

April 22, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judy Kay Miskell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1108

Doc: 7

Filed: 04/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Judy

Kay

Miskell

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

returning correspondence that Miskell attempted to file in her
closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

Miskell v. Chase, No.

1:15−cv−00019-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2016).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2