James Frasier v. Carolina Ctr for Occup. Health
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-03431-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-1114]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES LAMAR FRASIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH,
Defendant – Appellee,
COUNTY OF CHARLESTON; CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; AL
CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as Sheriff of Charleston
County; CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; MITCH LUCAS, in
his official capacity as Administrator of the Charleston
County Detention Center; CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, f/k/a
Prison Health Services, Incorporated; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2;
JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
David C. Norton, District Judge.
January 19, 2017
February 24, 2017
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Brian C. Duffy, Thomas A. Limehouse, Jr., DUFFY & YOUNG, LLC,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Stephen L. Brown,
Russell G. Hines, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
denying his renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and
motion for a new trial, following the jury verdict in favor of
Carolina Center for Occupational Health, LLC, in Frasier’s medical
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the
record on appeal and find no reversible error.
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Carolina Center for Occupational Health, LLC, No. 4:11-cv-03431DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?