James Frasier v. Carolina Ctr for Occup. Health


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-03431-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000030133].. [16-1114]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1114 Doc: 38 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1114 JAMES LAMAR FRASIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, Defendant – Appellee, and COUNTY OF CHARLESTON; CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; AL CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as Sheriff of Charleston County; CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; MITCH LUCAS, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Charleston County Detention Center; CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Prison Health Services, Incorporated; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:11-cv-03431-DCN) Submitted: January 19, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017 Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 16-1114 Doc: 38 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Brian C. Duffy, Thomas A. Limehouse, Jr., DUFFY & YOUNG, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen L. Brown, Russell G. Hines, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1114 Doc: 38 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: James Lamar Frasier appeals the district court’s order denying his renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial, following the jury verdict in favor of Carolina Center for Occupational Health, LLC, in Frasier’s medical malpractice action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Frasier v. Carolina Center for Occupational Health, LLC, No. 4:11-cv-03431DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?