Lenir Richardson v. O. J. Faulk


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999758445-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999836930]. Mailed to: L. Richardson. [16-1125]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1125 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1125 LENIR RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer, badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH OF ATTORNEY; MARIO TORRES, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom, Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1125 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lenir Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion to remand and denying her motion for recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Richardson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Richardson may seek review the of judgment. these decisions on appeal from court’s final Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?