Lenir Richardson v. O. J. Faulk
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999758445-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: L. Richardson. [16-1125]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer,
badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH OF ATTORNEY; MARIO
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
May 26, 2016
May 31, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly Pace Baucom,
Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Lenir Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying her motion to remand and denying her motion for recusal.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
order Richardson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Richardson may seek
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?